Noah Thurner vs Arthur Nagel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 11:55 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Thurner vs A. Nagel

GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Thurner 0 - 1 Nagel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Noah Thurner winning 0 and Arthur Nagel winning 2. The last match between Arthur Nagel and Noah Thurner was at the M25 Sarreguemines, 22-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Arthur Nagel getting the victory 6-4 7-6(2).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Thurner | 0 |
| Nagel | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Sarreguemines(10-22-25)
N. Thurner vs A. Nagel H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 44.40% (103-129) | Career Total W/L | 61.90% (91-56) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Thurner vs A. Nagel Match Preview:
- In terms of second serve points won over the last six months, Arthur Nagel edges Noah Thurner slightly, with percentages of 43.38% and 42.97% respectively.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Noah Thurner has a small advantage by winning 43.45% of the points compared to Arthur Nagel's 43.28%.
- Arthur Nagel excels at returning first serves, achieving a higher metric (27.13%) than Noah Thurner (24.82%). Could this be critical for breaking serve?
- Noah Thurner shows a more effective ability to save breakpoints, managing a 54.92% save rate as opposed to Arthur Nagel's 48.98%, offering an edge in key moments.
- Looking at overall match performance in the past year, Arthur Nagel holds a better win percentage of 61.67% against Noah Thurner's 53.23%.
- Noah Thurner performs best on hard courts with a 45% career win rate, whereas Arthur Nagel's strength lies on clay, also with a 45% win rate.
- Both players primarily compete at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, with Arthur Nagel winning a higher percentage (62.07%) than Noah Thurner (53.23%).
- Despite Noah Thurner playing opponents with a higher average ranking (277.29), Arthur Nagel's win rate may suggest he capitalized well against his lower-ranked opponents (average rank 435.4).
- In deciding sets, Arthur Nagel is significantly stronger, winning 58% of them, compared to Noah Thurner's 25%. Is this the deciding factor?
- The impact of current event performance and specific tournament history can be vital in making final predictions.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing both players' recent performances, Arthur Nagel seems to have slight advantages in several key areas. His win rate over the last 12 months outpaces that of Noah Thurner, suggesting he handles match situations well overall.
Arthur Nagel's proficiency at returning first serves and his remarkable record in deciding sets could likely prove decisive in a closely contested match where these factors often turn the tide.
Despite Noah Thurner's advantage in playing higher-ranked opponents and saving breakpoints more efficiently, these may not overcome Arthur Nagel's strengths in other significant areas.
Based on these comparative insights, Arthur Nagel is arguably the favorite to win the upcoming tennis clash.
Noah Thurner vs Arthur Nagel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Thurner vs A. Nagel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 10 | Games Won | 13 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:27:24 | Average Match Time | 1:27:24 |
| 59% (41/70) | 1st Serve % | 73% (45/62) |
| 78% (32/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 89% (40/45) |
| 52% (15/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (10/17) |
| 0% (0/1) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 19% (12/62) | Return Points Win % | 33% (23/70) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Thurner Recent Matches Played
A. Nagel Recent Matches Played

N. Thurner vs A. Nagel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 44.40% (103/129) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.90% (91/56) |
| 46.64% (236/270) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.10% (198/137) |
| 48.69% (2397/2526) | Games Win/Loss | 54.28% (1700/1432) |
| 45.07% (32/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 43.75% (56/72) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.82% (52/27) |
| 45.45% (15/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (36/27) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 309 | Aces Total | 422 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 450 | Total Double Faults | 300 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:18:44 |
| 228.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 335.12 |
| 67% (4602/6823) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5304/8183) |
| 66% (3033/4602) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3538/5304) |
| 44% (981/2221) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1448/2879) |
| 43% (257/600) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (349/804) |
| 38% (2568/6699) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3181/7923) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 44.40% (103/129) | Futures W/L | 62.07% (90/55) |
| 45% (103/230) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (89/145) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (33/68) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (17/35) |
| 32% (14/44) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (24/42) |
| 83% (116/96) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (90/79) |
| 17% (116/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (90/11) |
| 6% (116/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (56/11) |